| 6/30/10 – 8:15
– The
pressure on stocks that seemed to have attracted the bid to treasuries
yesterday morning got more intense as the day went on. The S&P, which was
down 15 points prior to yesterday’s opening, closed down 33 and printed a new
low of the bigger move, below that of May 25th. I haven’t liked the
stock market since before the 1130 high print of 6/21 and I still don’t like it
and suspect that still much lower prices lie ahead. As far as the 10-year goes,
the most bullish count I have been monitoring is that an impulse wave began from
the low on 6/03 and we are only in the 3th wave of that impulse.
That count has displaced all others in terms of being my preferred count and
yesterday’s opening gap, which was never tested, is what one might look for at
this stage of a 3rd wave. Before I confuse those of you who don’t
follow the wave theory closely, the rally that began on June 3rd may
well be a 5th wave of the bigger move that began back in April but
if that is the case then we are likely in the 3rd wave of that 5th
wave. There is a more bullish way to label the move that would place the
treasuries in a larger degree 3rd wave but for now, I am only
concerned about the near term as after Friday, I may need to start an altogether
new count. Right now though, things look very bullish. As good as the bond market looks, the stock market looks equally as bad –
or even worse – based on wave theory. It’s pretty easy to count 5 waves down
from the April top, followed by a correction to a perfect target from several
perspectives and now back to the lows in what can easily be interpreted as
another impulse. I will continue to say that my most optimistic objective for
the SPX is at about 1008 with a perhaps better one closer to 950 and those are
not even bearish objectives but rather ones that could hold if in fact the
highs from April are interim highs and this decline is only a correction. At
this point, I’d have to say that it is equally possible that we have made a
more meaningful top and that we could be in for a much more protracted decline.
<chart> 6/29/10 – 8:15
– Even
without much help from stocks yesterday, the treasuries kept their bid and made
solid new highs across the curve. Overnight brought the help from the stock
market as this morning, the S&P futures are down a solid 15 points and with
that, the 10-year is up nearly half a point. Yesterday, the 10’s fell just one
basis point shy of the last solid resistance target I have there at 3.026
before I would need to divert my eyes to the 30-year and now they’re set to gap
over that area and perhaps over 3% as well. When I look to the 30’s, I see
solid resistance beginning just 2 bps from yesterday’s close at 4.013 and
running all the way down to 3.88, although I do believe that the 3.90/88 area
is the best of it all. All the targets and resistance aside, last week I was
able to eliminate the notion of an A-B top from the equation and by this
morning, the B-wave appears to be gone as well. That seems to leave only the 2
bullish counts, one calling for a wedge and the other, now seemingly the more
likely, suggesting ‘nothing short of a price explosion’ and in that second
scenario, even with the strength this morning, the 10’s haven’t gone nearly far
enough to satisfy the objectives. It’s also getting so late in the month that
the timing can just about be ignored, although a lot about what is going to
happen moving forward is still very dependent upon Friday’s numbers. A slight
deviation from market expectations doesn’t have to impact patterns but a real
surprise will very likely move the markets in a big way regardless of where
they are prior or what the charts look like. As of yesterday’s close, volume patterns remained less than impressive as
the highest volume day that the 10’s have seen since 6/04 was the downside
reversal last Thursday and the last 2 up days were made on decreasing volume.
Meanwhile the recent peak in open interest came on 6/15. Those 2 things alone
should have made one suspicious of the rally but the most important ingredient
of any analysis is still price and there it is basically a one-way street. Just
since April the 10-year has run 100 bps and you don’t need to look at
oscillators to call that overbought – but then you only have to look at the
market to realize that’s not enough to end the rally. In the final analysis, what
may prove to be the most important resistance comes not from Fibonacci or
trend-lines or gaps but rather from the simple fact that both the 10-year and
the 30-year are flirting with major yield handles and while I did see solid
resistance just above 3% in the 10’s and just below 4% in the 30’s, even if I
didn’t I would still respect those sorts of levels heading into a jobs report
and especially after such a strong and extended rally. If there are still any shorts
in these markets, the bid may not go away but with upside gaps today over those
important yield handles, it will be interesting to see if there will be enough new
buying below 3% in the 10’s and below 4% in the 30’s to push them much further without
any new fuel. Of course, aside from the jobs report on Friday, the best potential
source of fuel for bonds is always a weak stock market and stocks are still
showing me no signs that they are bottoming. In fact, they show me no signs
that they don’t have another major leg down in front of them and should they
give up the lows from last week at any time, don’t expect to see the treasuries
back off very much. With last week’s low in the SPX just below 1068 in jeopardy
on the opening today, there is little support left this side of the lows of the
move near 1040. The SPX will have given back about 75% of the rally this
morning and that much of a giveback would typically be followed by new lows of
the move. So whether or not the stocks can stabilize before Friday, they
continue to appear to me that they are headed lower – perhaps much lower - and
that was always the ‘fly in the ointment’ with regards to any bearish outlook
for the treasuries. And how could I not follow up yesterday’s mention of the
testing of that 14-year old gap in BP. Well, it held on Friday and produced a
bounce of $1.20 by early yesterday before giving it all back and making a new
low at 26.75 – the exact gap fill price.
Coincidence or what, I do not know, but what can you say about a 14-year old
gap that still influences a market? While the bonds made a nice move yesterday, Gold was the source of the
real fireworks as it posted a significant outside down reversal, falling nearly
$30 after coming within $3 of the historic high it made just a week ago. I’m
still not comfortable with any pattern calls there but I’ll keep a watch to see
what transpires. The Dollar Index bounced a bit but not enough to make me think
it isn’t still headed lower while my newest victim of charting, the CRB Index,
backed up a little but not enough to mean anything. As far as wave counts go for the 10-year, as mentioned earlier it is
looking more and more like the only valid counts are bullish ones. A lower
close today following what looks to be large upside gaps in the making would
suggest a high is in place prior to Friday’s numbers but that’s about as
negative as I would get just yet. It will take a trade back below 121-07+ to
push the most bullish count to the back burner. The ‘wedge’ or ‘diagonal
triangle’, a less friendly but still incomplete bullish pattern, is still a
possibility but it becomes very unlikely if we don’t reverse today’s strong
openings. While I would prefer to see a pattern that I can live with before
taking a position, a word of warning in here is that sellers can emerge at
anytime, especially with jobs due out on Friday in front of a holiday weekend,
and once those numbers come out we may just need to wipe the slate clean and
start the counts all over again. For now though, the bonds look like they can
continue higher while just the opposite is true of the stocks. I haven’t had much new to show by way of charts so I have chosen to keep
the file size down but I will be posting some prior to Friday labeled to show
where I think we can be, as well as where I think we might be going; a sort of
roadmap if you will.
6/28/10 – 8:15
– While
on Thursday the treasury markets made new highs of the move and then closed
lower producing downside reversals from some great targets, on Friday they
recovered and the 10-year futures actually made another new high of the move
although none of the other charts that I watch could managed to do as well. The
cash 10’s did post their best close since the first week of May - of 2009 - and
that alone should be enough to extend the rally at least a little. That leaves very few indications that we are
at any sort of top but I will still tell you that if the treasuries are
impulsing up, the only alternative, then wave theory would suggest a price
explosion is imminent and each day that goes by without one seems to be saying that
the impulsive count is not the correct one. The one problem with using the wave
theory that way to suggest that this rally is a B-wave is the fact that Friday
brings with it the jobs data and the markets may not be willing or able to make
too big of a move in either direction with that 500 pound gorilla hanging over
them. Like a coiled spring, however, the longer we don’t move appreciably from
where we are, the bigger the move is likely to be and especially if there are any
surprises in the data. Stock traders may also want to wait for Friday’s data before pushing
things too far but I see nothing in those charts that looks very constructive.
Anything is possible but that market looks like it has another large leg down
in front of it and more so than treasuries, stocks probably need a friendly
number on Friday to take the heat off. The 1040 SPX area held lows in February,
May and again this month and if it gives way, things could get pretty dicey. As
of Friday, the last rally had been retraced by more than 71% and that is not
the kind of action a bull should want to see. Resistance in the SPX is best
from 1100 to 1105 and only above that area will things begin to look up; no pun
intended. And while on the subject of stocks, I found a fairly remarkable
feature on a chart of the stock that I most love to hate; BP. That stock had another
bad day on Friday that began with a downside gap of about $1 and that was close
to the best level of the day. It eventually closed down closer to $2 finishing
off another terrible week but even that isn’t what got my attention. I was
looking back to see how long it had been since BP had traded at these levels;
the low on Friday which was also the low of the move having been at 26.83. As
it turns out, there is a weekly gap on the GP chart that runs from 26.75 to
26.91 so Friday’s low was the exact mid-point of that gap which was left almost
exactly – drum roll please - 14 years ago, from the last week in June to the
first week in July of 1996. Now there’s a gap that I bet nobody thought would
get filled. I doubt the storm there is over but wouldn’t it make for an
interesting trade if that market began to recover when it opened this morning? The Dollar Index had an outside down reversal on Friday and looks to me
to be on the verge of a secondary sell-off. It’s way too soon for me to make a
case for the decline being either impulsive with a long ways to go, or
corrective prior to the next rally. If the index does break down from here, I
would expect at least several weeks down before any sort of low can be made.
Daily stochastic oscillators have already reached into oversold territory but
what looks more important is that the weekly is headed down now and from
overbought readings with clear bearish divergence. Of all the charts I watch
and report on either regularly or occasionally, Gold is the one whose placement
is the most difficult for me to read. It may come clearer in the coming days or
weeks but right now I have no opinion what-so-ever. One market that I keep a
chart running on but rarely mention is the CRB Index and I notice there, that
after a near 100 point rally from the spring of 2009, it turned down in January
and found some support on 5/25, the same day that the Stocks bottomed. The low
in the Index came after it had retraced 49.67% of the rally so despite some
recent published articles mentioning the ‘D’ word, as in ‘deflation’, that
market may be poised for a big run. I should mention that it had a nice rally
after an intra-day break of the 38% retracement back in early February but
obviously that low didn’t ultimately hold. I’ll try to continue to update on
that chart as well. Back to the 10-year where I continue to look for a top but with some reservations. While the chart I posted on Friday showed 2 ways to count the rally, one bullish and the other bearish, the fact that the 10’s made another new high and perhaps more importantly, the fact that all of the other treasury markets now have made double tops against Thursday’s highs, makes the bullish case seemingly more appealing – at least based on wave structure. That said, I’m still having a hard time buying into that bullish case. The timing still has me concerned and as mentioned before, while the bullish count does suggest an explosion is imminent, the news at the end of the week would seem to defy that logic, especially given that we are already at the lowest yields seen in more than a year. I will continue to use 3.02 as the level that once broken, would leave me with no interest in being short the 10’s and 3.90/88 in the 30’s as the last really meaningful resistance near here in long-dated treasuries. 6/25/10 – 8:15
– While
not the best reversal I’ve ever seen, a reversal nonetheless. All maturities
opened near their highs and closed near their lows and all closed lower on the
day following new highs of the move. I won’t totally give up on the notion that
we can still impulse to the upside but yesterday’s action is definitely not
consistent of market action within a 3rd wave and that makes me very
wary of things in here. I still don’t like stocks but the fact is that the
S&P broke from 1082 to 1067 and the best the 10-year could do during that break
was rally 5 ticks after having fallen 20. In markets like these, I would never
hold a short position in treasuries without keeping one eye on stocks but for
the purposes of analysis, each stands alone and right now I don’t like either.
One remaining bullish pattern that I have not really addressed is a wedge that
would have begun on 6/03. Wedges are typically 5th wave patterns
described in one prominent wave book as formations that occur as 5th
waves in markets ‘that have gone too far, too fast’. While not a pure impulse
wave, if we are in a wedge, then like an impulse the final high will not likely
come for several weeks so timing suggests that it is not as likely as would be
either of the B-waves that I have been mentioning. A trade below 120-10 would
eliminate the wedge as a possible pattern. It seems like a bond market report is not complete these days without a
mention of stocks. They made new lows of the current decline yesterday and as
far as I’m concerned, that makes the decline a 5-wave move at this point. Until
stocks bounce enough for me to believe the first leg is over, I won’t be
posting much in the way of specific objectives but yesterday the SPX traded below
its’ 62% corrective target of the previous rally so given that I think that
stocks are in their first 5-wave decline and they have already exceeded their
62% target, I don’t see this move holding above the 5/25 lows, and if those
lows don’t hold, I can make a strong wave-based case for a move to at least
1008 and more like 950ish, yesterday’s close being 1074. Remember, this break
comes from a perfect objective in the SPX at 1130 and one almost as good -
although I had failed to post it until after the fact - in the Nasdaq. With
that sort of an outlook for stocks, it should be no mystery why I think it is
important to watch them if you are involved in a bond trade. I’m often amazed by the ‘symmetry’ in the markets, in this case with
regards to objectives. Looking for a potential B-wave high, which should come
up against the previous high, I see that the 10-year exceeded its’ previous
high by 4+ ticks while the 30-year failed to achieve its’ by 6 ticks. The cash
10’s had printed 3.06 in the overnight session back on 5/25 and the low yield
yesterday was at 3.068. Again, only the cash 30’s still have an un-met
objective for that pattern and it would be closer to 3.88/3.90. If the rally
continues, then all that I see in the way of meaningful resistance is at 3.026
in the 10’s and then those aforementioned objectives in the 30’s. I touched on volume in yesterday’s update and how it has been
disturbingly low during the rally. Yesterday, while still lower than a 50-day
moving average, the volume was higher than it has been on any rally day since
6/04 and yesterday was a down day so that too is disturbing. The rally from the
lows on the 21st now looks to be a 5-wave move while the decline yesterday
still looks like just a 3. A trade below 121-05 before a trade above 121-16+
would make the decline a 5 as well while any trade above 16+ first would
suggest that the highs are not yet in place. If there is a number below to use
as a near-by stop, to me it is still 120-22, although because of the potential
wedge pattern I mentioned in the first paragraph, 120-09 might make more sense
if you care to give it that much room. If the 10’s are in an impulse to the
upside from the lows on 6/03, then we are in wave-2 of wave-3 and from a low in
the upper 120’s to the lower 121’s, I would expect to see nothing short of a
price explosion. 6/24/10 – 8:15
– Even
without the upside gap yesterday morning, we still got a strong up day that Tuesday
suggested was coming and the bid remains this morning. In fact, as things stand
now, we might just get those upside gaps today. Perhaps not much has been settled
just yet though since the treasuries are all still knocking against the previous
highs of the move. This leaves the door open for any of the 3 wave
interpretations that I mentioned in yesterday’s update to still play out. One
thing that has happened is that the treasuries have now made clear new highs
above the day session highs of 5/25 which potentially satisfies the targeted timing
for a major trend-change in ‘mid to late June’. All that has to happen now for
the timing to ‘do its’ thing’ is the rally needs to end but that may be asking for
a lot. If the 10’s are impulsing up, then they are in the early stages of a 3rd
wave and given that 3rd waves are typically the strongest rallies in
any sequence, if that is where they are I wouldn’t expect to see much in the way
of weakness from current levels nor would I expect to see a top for another
week or more. While I don’t have a specific price nearby that tells me we are not in an impulse wave, a trade below
120-22 would look very suspicious and hint to me that some sort of high has
been seen. If that were to occur, I would be left with 2 viable wave counts.
One would have us heading back down in a C-wave with the best objective being
118-21+/31, with a less likely though still valid target area around 119-24/30.
The other count is the one I first mentioned yesterday which makes this a top
of more important proportions. I’ll dive further into that notion at a later date
since it won’t matter much at least until we get to the highest objective. For
now my focus is on whether or not the rally stops at all. The really interesting thing about where we are, at least for me, is that
now the timing, the pattern and the levels are all very compelling. With a
window of about 2 weeks that best defined the timing target for a turn, on a
weekly chart this week figured to be 1 of the 2 best weeks to see a reversal.
And now, while the bonds may continue up and destroy the timing for this week,
until they do????? And then there’s the pattern. If this is only the B-wave of
a flat, then the highs won’t hold for very long and the timing won’t have meant
so much but if it proves to be the B-wave of that A-B top I mentioned
yesterday, then pattern and timing will have come together in an extraordinary way.
And as far as price goes, consider that the target area for either B-wave is at
the previous highs and then look at where we are. The 10-year futures are
currently trading at 121-24 while previous high of the move was 121-20+ while
the 30-year is at 125-29 with the previous high being 126-05. The cash 10’s
touched 3.098 on 5/25 and yesterday they traded at 3.092. Overnight on 5/25
they managed a trade at 3.06, a level that could come into play early this
morning as could the 3.02 area which represents a 50% correction of the entire
bear market that began in 12/02008. The cash 30-year is the only chart I use
for wave analysis that hasn’t yet made it to its’ best targets which remain
near 3.90/3.88. The bottom line is that great objectives are being met as you
read this and during a great timing window and now all there is to do is wait
and see if they hold. The stock market extended the decline from yesterday by 10 SPX points in
the first hour before stabilizing and making a high in the afternoon. Should they
make another new low today, the decline will look to be a 5-wave move and I
think that spells trouble for stocks. A trade back over 1108 first pretty much
makes the break corrective and not likely to continue. This pattern should clear
up today. Looking past the timing and the wave patterns, I see that open interest
in the 10’s has actually tailed off from a crest on 6/15 at 1,727,648 to
1,698,712 on Tuesday. That’s a decline of almost 29,000 contracts representing
about $3billion worth of bonds that apparently were, on balance, bought to
cover short positions. That’s, not the kind of buying you want to see in the
early stages of a 3rd wave. Same with volume as it continues to be below
the 50-day average and that, too, is disappointing from a market that is making
new 52-week highs. Nothing new with oscillators as the daily is just getting
overbought but the weekly is well overbought. I can look at all of the clues I care to but at the end of the day, it is the wave patterns that I am most concerned about and they should tell us something very soon. Again, a trade below 120-22 will be my first indication that we have seen a high; just how important I can’t yet tell. A break to a new high should encounter resistance down to 3.02 in the 10’s and then only the 30 year could be counted on to stop the rally, likely near 3.90/3.88. I’ve always said that the strength of the wave work comes from the process of elimination; using price action to eliminate potential counts until you are hopefully down to one. The last 2 days have eliminated the triangle as a potential count and a trade below 120-22 will all but eliminate the impulse up. That would leave us with just 2 counts and either would suggest a decline of more than a point and likely as much as 2 ½. It may take a little longer on the upside to eliminate the B-wave theory but one way or the other I am closing in on a preferred count that should guide me for the foreseeable future. Given where the markets are set to open this morning, a lower close would be troubling. 6/23/10 – 8:15
– If
ever there were going to have been a burst up in treasuries towards a final top,
today seemed like a perfect day. The rally that began 2 days ago at what was
the low of the range for the previous 8 days, carried into the close yesterday
and produced the second highest close the 10-year has made during this entire
move. In fact, it was the second lowest yield close since May of 2009. This
week, while perhaps not as prime as was last week for a turn, still fits well
into the timing band that has worked for the past 7 years, and that has to be
considered a strong factor at least until we know that it isn’t going to work
this time. The wave theory would say that the notion of a triangle is all but
dead now unless the correction is going to extend for another month or more
which leaves me thinking that the move up out of the lows on the 3rd
at 118-26 is either a nearly completed B-wave, or a still unfolding impulse
wave. If it is a B-wave, then it should stop near the previous highs which are
121-20 in the overnight session but at 121-11 using day session prices only. If
the 10’s don’t stop at one of those areas, then they are more likely in an
impulse with objectives much higher. At any rate, everything seemed to be lined
up well for a strong opening today but as is frequently the case the market isn’t
cooperating and appears set to open pretty flat. That doesn’t preclude a strong
day but now, not so likely one with a gap to work against. There is one last
Elliott pattern that I have not mentioned before as even the book calls it very
rare and hardly worth using as a forecasting tool, although this might be a
good time to bring it up. It is called an A-B top and it would basically
describe a simple double top. The difference in an A-B top and a B-wave top is
that the B-wave would precede a move back to 118-26 before a final high would
be made while the A-B top would be just that – a top – with no rally to follow.
It differs from an impulse wave in that it is a 3-wave rally and not a 5 so
from that perspective, we could be near the end of the move - if that is how it
is going to end. I bring it up now because timing would still suggest that a
high is made this week and it isn’t very likely that an impulse could complete
that quickly since we would only be in the 3rd wave right now. In
any case, even without a strong opening today, the time and pattern coming in
makes a test of the highs likely - and very soon. Waiting out this correction
has been an ordeal but it seems that we are about to find out just how the wave
count, as well as the timing, will actually play out. I read two pieces yesterday from stock forecasters. One comes from a
cycle analyst whose work I do respect and he believes that the entire rally in
stocks since 3/09 is a bear market rally but one that will continue into next
year before the lows from last year could once again come into play. The other
comes from none other than the Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, of Robert Prechter
fame, and they think that stocks are already headed down in an impulse wave
that will ultimately take out the 2009 lows. I don’t know who’s right but I do
know that the chart posted in yesterday’s update should make anyone who understands
wave theory respect the possibility that another impulse down could be on the
way. If you haven’t paid close attention, the SPX can easily be counted as
having declined in a 5-wave move from the April highs and from the lows of 5/25,
it appears to have corrected up to a near perfect touch of the 50% corrective
target for the entire decline as well as the 1.382% extension of the A-wave. I
didn’t mention this yesterday but the Nasdaq 100 posted a high on Monday at
1939.77 while the 62% correction there would have been at 1942.10. That’s a
miss of 2 points following a rally of nearly 200. The last 2 bad down days
during the rally off of the late May bottom were followed by enormous rally
days so when the stocks opened higher yesterday, I had to wonder if there was
to be a three-peat but while yesterday began with a burst, it ended with the
markets closing on their lows and well below Monday’s low. I’d have to say that
right now, the decline of the past 2 days looks like a 3 but if the stocks can hold
a low for several hours before making a new low, it would change the look to
one of an impulse wave and that would mean more downside to follow. Much like in the
fixed income markets, today could pretty much be a make it or break it day as
far as the pattern is concerned in stocks. 6/22/10 – 8:15
– There’s
always been talk of the summer doldrums hitting the markets and yesterday was
the first day of summer. Seriously, could the doldrums really get any worse? Of course, most associate that notion with
stock trading and stocks have had a nice move over the course of the past 3
weeks. The day after the 5/25 bottom, the Dow closed at 9974 and yesterday
it closed at 10,442. On the same day, the 10-year closed at 120-10+
and yesterday it closed at 120-10. Maybe that should tell us to forget
about the stock market when looking for clues that might impact the bond market
but then again, looking for clues on a bond chart these days is like looking
for a needle in a haystack; there’s just nothing there. I noticed yesterday that
if you draw a line through the middle of the range that has contained the
10-year since the highs on 5/25, that line, which has a value of 120-02, has
been touched on all but 6 of the trading days since then. In fact, on 7 of the
last 8 trading days, the low of the day in the 10’s has been between 119-23+
and 119-30; Friday being the lone exception. And a perfect example of how
traders deal with a market like that can be found by looking at the highs of
the day yesterday. Following large downside gaps, the markets recovered until
the 10-year futures filled that opening gap by just a plus. Meanwhile, the high
of the day in the 30-year was 2 ticks shy of its’ gap. Just the opposite happened
in cash where the 10’s left a gap of .002 bps while the 30’s just barely filled
theirs. What does all of this mean? To me it means that if you are a trader then
you should be buying weakness and selling strength on a daily basis and not
looking for a top or a bottom. That will certainly change and probably as soon
as you try to trade it that way but for now, this is just a trading range. So now that we can all agree that the stocks are not having an impact on
bonds, I feel compelled to mention that the high yesterday in the SPX was at 1131.23
while the area of 1130 has been my preferred target there for quite some time
now, mentioned as recently as yesterday in the update. 1130.29 represents the
50% correction of the decline off of the April highs while 1131.85 is where
what can be the C-wave of an ABC is equal to 1.382% of the A-wave, a nice
Fibonacci extension. And now it represents a reversal high as well. That’s not
to say it’s a top as I will only go there if I can count 5-waves down but
yesterday marked the 9th consecutive higher high since the day of
the bottom and that sort of a rally begs to be sold. The bearish count, if it
is to unfold, is that from the lows on 5/25, we saw an A-wave up to the highs
of 6/03, a B-wave down into the lows of 6/08 and now possibly a C-wave that
ended yesterday at a great objective. The entire upside correction would have lasted
18 trading days while the preceding decline lasted 21. That makes for a fairly symmetrical
picture and now it will be all up to wave structure as far as I’m concerned. A
5-wave decline tells me another will follow while a choppy decline means buy
the pullback. The next several days should tell the tale. Keep in mind that there
have been 2 nasty down days since the lows from 6/08 and each was followed by a
blistering rally but neither of those reversals came from an objective quite like
the one hit yesterday in the SPX. While on the subject of reversals, it should be noted that yesterday Gold
made a new all-time high at 1266.60 before reversing and closing at 1233.40.
That is quite the outside day from an all-time extreme but I can’t quite see
the wave count that would have that as a top. I’ll stay on top of that chart
though. From here, I hate to say it but it may be all about the stocks. If
yesterday proves to be the end of a corrective rally there, I just cannot see the
bonds going down much since my objective for any secondary sell-off in stocks
is nowhere near where we have been so far. I can’t yet say that is what is
about to unfold but I can’t rule it out either and if there is to be another
hard break, it couldn’t come from a better level. If you don’t care to pay
attention to the equities, then I would use a trade above 120-26+ as an
indication that we are likely going to re-test the highs, while 119-19 now
becomes an extremely important support level. If you wish to play little closer
to the vest, I would use 120-19 as the number to beat on the upside and 119-29+
below but in a market as range-bound as this one has been, using nearby numbers
as an indication of further follow-through is fairly risky.
6/21/10 – 8:15 – On Friday, I was using a trade below 120-14+ as the first sign that we may be in for some downside and the 10’s traded as low as 120-11+ before closing at 120-14. While the breach of that 14+ was anything but impressive, looking at the screens as early as last night, that appears to have been a good plan as the 10’s were down more than half a point in early trading and remain that way now. When looking at a daily chart with overnight extremes on it, Friday’s high touched a trend-line drawn off the 5/25 top and again over the 6/08 highs and that could qualify as the D-wave of a triangle. For that to prove to be the correct count now, we would need to see a test of the 5/25 top at 121-20+ before trading at 119-23. A break of 23 first would mean that the 10’s were likely in a C-wave decline that could still prove to be the C-wave of a larger triangle with objectives in the low 119’s, otherwise it would likely be the C-wave of a flat with objective nearer 118-13. This is getting as old for me to write as it must be for you to read but all I can see to do is wait out this sideways trade to see which way we are really going to break. There is nothing different to be gleaned from the chart of the 30’s or from the cash charts. When examining the daily charts for other clues, I see that volume remains below the 50-day average and has been for all but one day since 6/27. Oscillators remain stuck, neither overbought nor oversold. Even if I can’t get a clear read on the wave structure, I would still want to see a breakout of the trading range that has contained the treasuries for the past several weeks - and one that was accompanied by strong volume – before I would get too excited. That will happen but I just don’t know when. The weekly charts should probably be read as negative since there, I see a market that is overbought and near the best levels seen in more than a year but with dwindling volume. That doesn’t preclude a spike to a new high with or without increasing volume and the timing remains ripe for that. It’s just a waiting game for me and one that will likely produce better results than ‘guessing’ in which direction the next move might come. The stocks continue to grind higher with the Dow now having made higher daily highs on every day since the low of the move back on the 8th. That’s 8 consecutive higher highs and you have to look pretty hard to find a time when that has happened so from that perspective alone, the stocks seem to be getting at least short-term overdone. The Dow is approaching its’ 50% correction at 10,516 while the SPX is lagging a bit, its’ target being 1130. If this rally in the stocks is a C-wave, which is what I believe, then it will be a 5-wave advance, the same as if it were the beginning of a much larger impulse up. The difference in those 2 counts will show itself only in how the stocks back away from any high. A corrective pullback lasting a few days could prove to be very bullish while an impulse down could be the beginning of a very large break with major implications to both stocks and bonds. As far as a trading strategy for the 10-year goes, having not held at 120-14+, I would look for a test of at least 119-29+ with the gap at 119-19+/22 a reasonably important support area. Below that suggests more downside for at least another day and likely as far down as 119-09 and more likely closer to 118-13+ or lower. So for now, that leaves me a bit negative. The treasuries are set to open with pretty significant downside gaps so a trade in the 10-year back into Friday’s range at 120-11+ will be needed to erase the gap and take the pressure off. A trade above 120-22 should be followed by a test of 121-05 at the very least. Those are probably pretty good parameters to work with but I still think that the best plan of action is to stand aside and wait for something more concrete to develop before taking much of a position on either side of the market. Having been out of town, I haven’t posted many charts lately so I thought I would show charts of the 10-year futures as well as the cash in today’s report. On the first chart which is of the futures, the 2 red lines are pretty self-explanatory. The upper one is the trend-line that could prove to be the upper boundary of a triangle while the lower one is simply a parallel and defines the channel that should hold if we are building a ‘flat’ correction. The up-sloping trend-line, currently at 119-00, is about as far down as I would allow the market to go and still believe that a triangle is possible so if it is broken, the lower end of the channel in the low 118’s becomes a prime target although I would keep an eye on the wave equality target at 118-13+ as well as the Fibonacci retracement targets shown in red. When viewing trend-lines that are drawn off of anything other than very recent extremes, I think it is most important to view them on cash charts since the futures reflect cost of carry as well as thin markets back when they were not the ‘front month’ contract. As you can see in the yield chart, I have drawn the same trend-line off of the 4.01 yield crest in early April and it currently has a value of 3.329. If that line gets broken, while I would still be focused on wave structure, it would certainly put the burden on the bulls to prove that the entire rally has not come to an end. The Fibonacci retracement levels shown in red would then become most important.6/18/10 – 8:15
– Finally
something to get excited about. Well, maybe that’s an exaggeration but still, a
break above the range of the past 5 days and on some decent volume. That’s the
good news. The bad news is that all 3 counts that I have been talking about for
the past week plus are still viable. It’s really frustrating to try and write a
report each day using predominantly
wave
analysis and be unable to even eliminate any potential wave counts but ever
since the secondary highs of 6/08, it has appeared to me that the treasuries
are still headed higher but I have been unable to determine if the correction
has ended, if we are in the B-wave of a triangle or if we are in the B-wave of
a flat - and I still can’t tell. And it doesn’t help much to look at cash
charts or at the 30-year. I will say that I now believe that the triangle count
is probably the least likely but even that is little more than a guess. All of
the confusion however, should begin to clear up quickly as now there are few
resistance levels left which tells me that whatever is going to happen, is
going to happen soon. The futures only have the 6/08 highs of 121-05, the
daytime highs from 5/25 at 121-11 and the overnight highs from the same date at
121-20 between here and new highs of the move and if they cannot clear them all
very soon, the rally will likely prove to be just a B-wave and a journey back
down below 119 will appear to be likely. A trade back under 119-23+ would
strongly suggest that the B-wave scenario is correct while even a trade under
120-14+ would look suspicious. Being just 2 days past the middle of the month,
the ‘mid to late June timing’ is still very much in play so any new high
followed by a reversal could spell trouble. To make me confident that a top is
being made, I would want to see the rally that produced new highs to be a
5-wave move and for that to happen now, there still needs to be a clean new
high and then another correction lasting at least a week before the 5th
wave up so it does seem less likely than ever that a terminal high will occur
this month but still, the timing for around now is so good that any reversal
from a new high would be a difficult one for me to fade. I just simply need
more time to figure this one out. Boy, does that sound like a broken record. The stocks still appear to be headed higher based on wave structure and
the best targets from here still seem to be in the 1130 area basis the SPX. That’s
it. I have nothing to add to that statement that is anything more than filler. If the 10-year can close even unchanged today, it will be the best weekly
close in more than a year and that should be worth something – at least enough
to stay long. I would use a trade at 120-13+ to get me out of long exposure for
the weekend and hope to get a better grip on things next week. 6/17/10
– 8:15 – Inside days with slightly higher closes. I could stop right there as
there is still no new features to talk about. Since the big break last
Thursday, the high each day in the 10-year has been between 120-14 and 120-21
while the lows have ranged from 119-23+ to 119-26+. The 30-year chart is no
different as both are simply trading sideways. None of the 3 counts I have been
monitoring are time sensitive so sideways changes nothing and it can go on and
on. Today brings with it PPI and while CPI had little impact, that doesn’t mean
PPI can’t be a market mover. That said, unless and until these markets do
something, there is just nothing to talk about. A line from Bob Prechter’s book
on Elliott Wave theory, if not from Elliott himself, says that ‘if you don’t
know where you are, you are probably in a B-wave’ and in 2 of the 3 counts I am
considering, a B-wave is where I would place us. There’s no point in beating
this horse to death, hopefully I’ll have something more meaningful to say about
bonds tomorrow. There was one feature that seemed worth mentioning with regards to stocks
and that is that yesterday produced a ‘doji’ in the S&P futures. A doji is
a term used with candlestick charts to describe a day where the opening and the
close are at the same price. Yesterday they were just 1 minimum tick apart. Doji’s
are said to ‘frequently occur at market turns, especially after an extended
move in one direction’. In this case, the S&P has rallied 77 points since
6/08 and that qualifies as an ‘extended move’ but already this morning stocks
have traded back above yesterday’s highs. That could be reversed before the
NYSE opens depending on the inflation numbers but the bigger point may be that
just like with the 2 downside reversals over the course of the past 2 weeks,
there was a technical reason to sell stocks yesterday and already that would
have proven costly. This market is just not about to give up without a fight. Let’s get passed PPI and see if there is any appreciable movement in
price or change in pattern. While a trade beyond the range of the past 3 days
could be interpreted as a break out of sorts - the levels being 119-23+ below
and 120-18+ above - the fact is that if
we are doing a triangle, a break of those levels might not mean much at all.
Until we break out of a range one way or the other and do so with a pickup in
volume, there is just no reason to get involved and no way to make a call. The
bigger picture still says to me that trades between 118-13 and 121-20 do little
to change the corrective look to the past 3+ weeks – and for now corrective is
still good. 6/16/10
– 8:15 – The trade in fixed income yesterday was featureless but not so much so for
stocks. They reversed Monday’s reversal and then some as the Dow closed up more
than 200 points, the SPX more than 25. The 10’s couldn’t push above the first
level of resistance that meant anything to me which was 120-16 as they failed
from 120-13 and then traded down through their first meaningful support at
119-30, so even if the patterns have changed little, I would have to be a
little more defensive on fixed income than I was. But the truth is that without
micro-managing the charts, it still looks as though the 10’s have been in a
correction since the highs and as long as that is the case, I just can’t let
myself get too defensive. In making new highs of this push, the stocks cleared some good resistance
offered up by a wave equality target as well the 38% retracement of the decline,
leaving the next solid targets at about 1130 SPX and 10,500 Dow. That’s another
15 SPX points and about 100 Dow points which allows for a good push from here
but not one that couldn’t happen pretty fast. The daily stochastics are just
reaching into overbought territory and the volume has been less than impressive
so I am still thinking that this will prove to be a corrective rally, but with
no sign that it is done just yet. The strong upside reversal following such a
bad day on Monday makes me think that market is anything but tired and as I had
mentioned yesterday, the structure of the rally isn’t consistent with what a
C-wave should look like so for now, higher prices seem likely. I’m not sure how
the issue that I have with the wave structure gets resolved since it doesn’t
look impulsive which a C-wave is, unless the entire rally proves to be a wedge.
That is a valid pattern for a C-wave and were that to be the case, then the
target for the end of the wedge based on the overhead trend-line would be about
1118 when the stocks open today but by noon tomorrow, the same overhead trend-line
would be reaching that 1130 objective so by tomorrow it may be possible to
eliminate another count or 2. In the past 5 days we have seen downside reversals followed by upside
reversals followed by downside reversals in stocks as well as in bonds and each
time it happens it just makes me want to wait a little longer to see if a
bigger pattern might begin to come clear. The multiple reversals certainly
reveal a great amount of uncertainty on the part of traders in both markets and
it may very well prove to be a precursor to a change of trend in either or both
markets. And while I haven’t reported on it much of late, the Dollar Index has
fallen away from the highs of the move over the course of the past 7 days and
as it has done so, it has gone from extremely overbought to nearly oversold on
a daily chart. The weekly chart remains very overbought and seems to suggest
that absent a very quick recovery, the next leg down in that index could be a
large one, Gold continues to grind higher and higher as it seems to be the one
market that is still being driven by either fear or uncertainty – or both. I have always relied heavily on wave patterns for my analysis and always
will but there are times when simpler techniques may be just as revealing.
While the 10’s have the look of a market that is correcting from a high
implying further new highs are coming, when I look at a daily or weekly chart
of the 10’s or even the 30’s, what is glaring is just how sideways they have
really been moving for the past year. In the case of the 10’s, from last June
until now they have gone from 4.01 to 3.10 to 4.01 to 3.09 and if that isn’t a
well defined trading range then I don’t know what is. Over the same time frame,
the 30’s have gone from 4.84 to 3.89 to 4.86 and then to 3.98. With such good
timing for these markets to turn and with both of them at an extreme end of a
well defined trading range, it would be foolish to try to overanalyze them and
miss the bigger picture. PPI and CPI will be released over the course of the
next 2 days and with seemingly such little conviction on the part of traders
and with potentially conflicting clues coming from wave work and timing
analysis, all there is to do is to wait for the patterns to unfold. If we are
in fact doing a triangle from the highs, then the 10’s can trade as low as
about 119 while if it is a flat, a wave equality target would have them heading
down to 118-13. The point being that anyone who is long might have to take a
lot of heat just to see if the markets are really any good. This is still a
very high risk area. 6/15/10
– 8:15 – I’ll keep this short and sweet. Whatever wave counts were valid after
Friday, were still valid after yesterday. The treasuries started out weak but
never traded much lower than where they had opened. The 10’s traded slightly
lower than they had on Thursday while the 30’s held in above their lows from
last week leaving the patterns pretty much unchanged. I had remarked yesterday
that absent a recovery from what seemed likely to be a weak opening, we could
probably eliminate at least the count that had the impulse towards new highs
already underway if not the flat correction but the truth is that not one of
the 3 counts that I had outlined yesterday can be ruled out. The 10’s still
have a low that is between a 50 and a 62% retracement of the preceding rally
while the low in the 30’s continues to be an exact 62% correction and I’m
forced to wait at least another day before trying to settle on a preferred
count. Wave theory still tells me that new highs are coming even if the timing
has me more than just a little apprehensive about holding out for another
rally. The stocks, however, seem to be suggesting that the wave counts are what
to focus on since they opened strong but failed to retain their gains and closed
at the lows of the day; lower than where they had opened and lower than where
they had closed on Friday. The SPX finished 17 points off of its’ highs, the
Dow 138, and both came very close to resistance that was posted on the charts
yesterday. The high in the SPX was just under 1106 while the wave equality
target was 1107 and the 38% retracement was at 1109. Remember, this coming off
a low of 1042. The Dow posted a high of 10,329 while its’ 38% retracement was
at 10,341 and that after a rally of more than 550 points. If that proves to be
the end of a correction, then we could be about to see a very large sell-off,
clearly one that would produce new highs in fixed income. The previous declines
in stocks covered about 1,500 Dow points and 180 SPX points and wave theory
says that the second impulse is likely to be at least as large as the first. As much as the highs in stocks came in at great levels to suggest a hard
sell-off is in store, the structure of the rally is not really consistent with
what a C-wave should look like. At the same time, the structure of the
pull-back in treasuries is corrective looking but not necessarily complete. I
see no new clues from volume, open interest, oscillators or anything else and
think the best course of action is to wait another day or so before making a
more definitive call. Inflation numbers tomorrow and again on Wednesday could
make the difference but if I can find anything definitive with regards to pattern
after today, I will have it posted before the numbers tomorrow. Until then, I
would use a trade below 119-30 as a stop on any longs while using one above
120-16 as a reason not to be short. 6/14/10
– 8:15 – It’s back and forth enough to make you dizzy. A drop
in the 10’s of a point on Thursday was followed up by nearly that much of a
rally on Friday and this morning they’re set to open down around half a point. The
good news is that the more they swing up and down without really making any
progress one way of the other, the more corrective things look and that means
more upside. The low in the 10’s on Thursday was between a 50 and 62%
correction of the rally that began a week earlier while the 30-year made a
direct hit on its’ 62% number before reversing back to the upside so that’s all
good news. That said, I am still concerned about the timing which is best for
this week and actually in some respects, best for today and tomorrow but even
into next week fits with the pattern that has been so reliable for the past 7
years and that pattern would now suggest that we are about to make a top. It
may not work out but I don’t want to ignore what has been such a strong tendency
for the better part of this decade either. For now though, I see 3 potential
wave-based scenarios that point to new highs sooner or later. The rally on
Friday could have been the B-wave of either a triangle or a flat correction,
both of which would end with new highs being made. The triangle scenario,
perhaps the more likely of the two based on the weakness this morning, would
have this rally failing short of the highs from 6/08 at 121-05 and then
continuing to ‘coil up’ in an ever tightening range which could persist for
much of this week. The flat correction on the other hand, would call for a test
of the current high of the move which is at 121-11 in the day session or
121-20+ overnight and then a trade back down to the lows of 6/03 at 118-26
before the next rally commences. Without a recovery before the opening today, this
count seems to be losing credibility. The 3rd wave-based scenario would
have the lows from 6/03 the bottom of the correction and the rally to new highs
would be under way but this count too, is very suspect with the current
weakness. If the timing for a turnaround that has worked so well in the month
of June is to work again, then scenario #3 would have seemed like the best bet again,
the weakness this morning has all but put that one to bed. I still think that a
little more patience is in order until we
have a better feel as to whether the wave patterns or the timing – or both – or
neither - are going to dictate what is about to happen. For once, I can’t say that the rally in fixed income
was helped along by the stock market. On Friday, while the 10’s were up 22 32nds
and the 30’s up nearly a point and a half, the Dow gained 38 points in a
welcome change of recent patterns. That seems to bolster the notion that we
have made a low in stocks which I happen to think will prove to be only temporary.
My suspicion is that we are in a C-wave rally that should carry back to at
least the June 3rd highs of 1106 SPX and 10,315 Dow. Those
objectives are based on wave theory which says a flat correction is one where
the B-wave tests the previous lows and the C-wave then goes back to the
previous highs. Just as important are Fibonacci retracement targets which in
this case, are quite close to those levels. In the SPX, the 38% number is 1110
while in the Dow it’s 10,341. For today in the fixed income markets, if the 10’s trade under 120-09, which
it appears that they will do on the opening, it will be very unlikely that the
correction has ended and that they are headed up to new highs right away. It
will also greatly reduce the odds that the correction is a ‘flat’ thereby
making the likelihood of a triangle that much greater although I hate to label
triangles this early in their formation. It should, however, give me at least
have another day or so to figure out just what is going on. It will take a trade
back above Friday’s highs of 120-21+ to look constructive but even that would
still leave the door open for either of the 2 corrective scenarios to play out.
The truth is that it seems unlikely that a resolution to the patterns will come
as early as today although the elimination of one or 2 could. I will be
traveling for the remainder of the week and working with limited resources but
should be able to post these update on schedule. <charts> 6/11/10
– 8:15 – It seems like each day I look at the charts I see a different wave count.
I’ve vacillated lately between the notion that an impulse ended on 5/25 - or that
we just ended one on Wednesday that failed to make a new high. The duration of
the break off the 5/25 high vs the one off the 5/06 high made it seem like that
first high may have been the end of a 3rd wave and not a 5th
but now that we have held the late May highs for 12 trading days, it is
beginning to look more and more like we are in a larger degree move and that
seems to point back to the 25th as the more important extreme. While
I may continue to fight with the short-term patterns, the truth is that if I
cannot find an impulsive looking decline, then I have to assume we are in a correction
and if we are, then we are correcting a 90+ basis point rally and typically
that would mean another 90+ basis point rally was in the cards. I haven’t
reached that conclusion just yet, but for now, when I look at a daily chart it
appears that we are in a simple ‘flat correction’ from the 25th that
should bottom in the next several days, very near but likely below the lows of
6/03. When I look at intra-day charts, however, the structure is not so clear. There,
the 10-year appears to have declined off the 5/25 high in a 3-wave move and
then rallied back to the high on the 8th in a 5. That would seem to
suggest that the latter high was then end of the impulse and since the 10’s retraced
93% of the decline, that can qualify as a 5th wave failure. The 30’s
on the other hand can be interpreted as having declined off the highs of the 25th
in a 5 while the rally back is unclear. What is clear is that they only
recovered 79% of the initial break and that just doesn’t seem like enough for
me to call that one a failed impulse. I’m going to withhold judgment for a few
more days and see just how well the markets respond to support near the lows of
last week. If the correct count is that we are in a flat correction, then the
10’s should make a low in the range of supports that begins at 118-26 and
extends down to 118-13, give or take a very little. If that happens, be
prepared for another strong rally. In the cash 10’s, the range of good supports/targets
runs from the mid 3.40’s top the mid 3.50’s. The supports that I am most
interested in come from wave-equality targets, Fibonacci retracement targets
and trend-lines, all of which are important and all exist on the charts of both
the 10’s and the 30’s, cash as well as futures. That gives me a lot of levels
to deal with and that is another reason to be patient in here and let the
patterns tell us what to do. Nothing changes with regards to the timing which
seems best for next week but which, in the bigger picture, was in play for this
past week as well as it will be in play the week after next. To me, this is
another good reason to be patient. 6/10/10
– 8:15 – I know that those BP charts yesterday came out of nowhere but something
told me to show them anyway. Perhaps I was day early as they are even more
dramatic now after that stock dropped nearly 16% yesterday and on an amazing
238,639,664 shares. I wrote something yesterday that I sincerely hope is wrong
but just in case you missed it, I had said “It’s
probably bad news for the entire planet if that stock keeps falling as it would
seem to imply a lack of confidence that they can stop the bleeding at the well.
If they don’t, we could be in for an economic calamity that could not have been
imagined just a few months back.” I really do hope I was wrong but I still
feel that way. Not because of one more really bad day but with all of that
downside following all that had preceded it, the stock still closed on its’ lows
and shows no signs of bottoming. So while this is a report about bonds, the
implications of that mess may very well reverberate throughout the entire
economy for a long time to come and if that were to happen, any pending bear
market in bonds may need to be delayed for a while. I’ll still go by my charts
which suggest a top may be pending but they also suggest that a secondary rally
can develop in a month or so that could send the 10’s well into the 2% handle.
I’m still banking on this rally coming to an end very soon but picking tops can
get expensive and while I am looking for one, I’m going to want to see some
proof in the form of bearish wave structure on a decline, something that has
been hard to come by of late. Actually, the break from the highs on Tuesday to
the lows yesterday looks like a 5-wave move on the 30-year charts but it looks
more like a 3 on the 10-year due to the fact that they crested earlier in the
day on Tuesday. And even if both looked to be 5’s, the decline may just be the
C-wave of an irregular correction so I’m not at all sold on the fact that a
high has been made. I still love this general area and I still love the timing,
especially for Monday/Tuesday, but until I see signs of an end to the impulse
up and the beginning of an impulse down, I just will not let myself get too
negative. Nailing some good targets would be nice though. 6/09/10
– 8:15 – Still another good day in the treasuries and yet there’s still one gap
left unfilled, that in the cash 30-year. It’s amazing how reluctant the gaps
have been to give up but it seems inevitable that we will clear the last one
and almost as inevitable that we will make new highs across the curve. Still,
this morning the treasuries are set to open lower and the one problem that they
have is a general lack of any good support so we’ll just have to see if they
can turn it around again. It seems doubtful that we’ve seen any sort of top
just yet but the way we rallied out of the last low looks very impulsive and
that means we have either seen the first leg of the 5th wave up,
otherwise a 5th wave failure is not out of the question. That is a
term used in wave work to describe a final impulse wave that fails to make a
new extreme. The way the structure looks to me, if we hadn’t begun a pull-back by
today, I would have expected to see the 10’s trade through 2.90 in a fast burst.
Even a pull-back doesn’t preclude such a move but as the patterns look now, a
push through the recent highs could prove explosive based on the lack of any
selling since Friday – until now that is. The one thing that looks disturbing
and tells me a pull-back – if not a top - is pending is the poor volume during
this most recent push up. And when I factor in the timing beginning on Monday, I
can’t help but wonder if this recent rally is sustainable. I continue to love
the objectives in the 10’s near 3.02 and in the 30’s near 3.90 as well as the
timing for next week and especially for Monday/Tuesday but let’s get past this
first real sign of weakness since the lows last week. If we still have not seen
the highs, then this pullback should prove to be wave 2 of the final impulse up
and we should be making a hard run at the top by the end of the week or early
next and here comes the timing. <chart> 6/08/10
– 8:15 – With less than 30 minutes to trade yesterday, the 10-year futures finally
managed to overcome the gap left the day after the top, erasing the island
reversal and eliminating about the only negative feature left on that chart. The
other treasury charts didn’t do as well but the cash 10’s did narrow their gap
by 2 bps, the cash 30’s narrowed theirs by 6 bps and the 30-year futures only
managed to match their best levels from Friday. All of the treasuries did open
near their lows and close near their highs and that always makes for a strong
looking chart and there is a bid this morning which could produce another
interesting feature. A gap up today above the highs of yesterday that remained
unfilled would leave islands below in those latter 3 charts and good support as
well although they would need to firm up from current levels for that to occur.
It’s too soon to know just what would be the best count from the lows last Thursday
but I would suspect that we are about to experience another strong run not unlike
what we saw on Friday. If a secondary rally were to commence immediately, then
there is a wave equality target just above 3.01 which is very close to that 50%
number of 3.026 but that would only give us 3 waves from the lows last week and
we should get a 5-wave move so I’m thinking the best ultimate objective may
still be the 3.89/3.90 area in the 30-year – unless we are just not going to
stop anywhere near here in which case there is yet another good objective in
the 10’s at 2.792. For now, however, I think that may be overly optimistic. 6/07/10
– 8:15 – Prior to Friday morning, my preferred count had the treasuries still in a
downside correction from the highs due to the fact that I couldn’t find a
5-wave decline to end it that I could label a C-wave. My best alternative was
that the 5th wave rally that had begun on the 13th needed
2 more legs up to complete. None of that mattered, however, when the jobs
report was released on Friday. The treasuries had already opened strong and the
disappointing ‘private sector’ component of the jobs report sent them soaring.
The initial burst in the 10’s stalled out 1 tick shy of the bottom of the island
reversal gap left the day after the top in the 10’s but around mid-day, they
pushed into that gap at 120-17+ and spent the rest of the day playing around in
it, never quite managing to fill it. That came despite the fact that after the
initial push into the gap, the Dow lost another 130 points but the best the 10’s
could do is extend their highs by just 1 tick; such is the power of a gap. I
had said that once that gap was filled, new highs should be seen so by that
statement alone, I suppose that the door could still be open for a failure. I
doubt that’s going to happen though and suspect that new highs are coming, Now now
that I’ve looked at the charts, however, I’m inclined to believe that the
correct count is not that we are
extending in a 5th wave and need to complete 2 more up-legs, but
rather that the highs seen on 5/25 represented the end of the 3rd wave
of the rally that began in April and that would mean that we just began the 5th
wave on Thursday. I came to this conclusion based on the fact that the
correction that began from the highs on the 25th, which I had been counting as
a minor degree correction within the 5th wave, just lasted too long.
I have never liked a wave count that had a minor corrective wave lasting longer
than the larger degree corrections of the same impulse. In this case, if a 3rd
wave had crested on 5/06 as I had previously thought, then the 4th
wave lasted 5 days before the rally to the top commenced. From that top, we corrected
for 6 days before the bottom made on Thursday and I just cannot get comfortable
with a pattern like that. I now prefer to call the 5/25 top, the end of wave 3,
making the rally that began on Thursday, the 5th wave and probably
just the beginning of it. I know what you’re all thinking, you’re thinking ‘you
wave guys are all alike, you just keep changing the count until you find one
that works’. Well, you’re right but I’ll call that ‘adjusting’ the count so
that it continues to help going forward and hey, if I didn’t need to do that
from time to time, I’d be out fishing. So what does this change? In some ways
not much, The 10’s should still make new highs but unlike what I had been
thinking before, in this ‘newer’ count we don’t necessarily need to complete two more
impulses up, just one, and that could bring the highs a little sooner. And this
count keeps the mid-to-late June timing in the picture as well. I’ll deal more
with the timing in the coming days as I want to do some short-term analysis to see
if I can zero in on a ‘best fit’ date but I can tell you that the very best
time frame typically seems to be from the 13th to the 18th.
As far as price targets go, on any new highs, 3.02 in the 10-year represents
the 50% recovery of the entire bear market that began in December of 2008 when
the 10’s hit 2.03 and that should be a very solid level. In addition to that, what
I really like is 3.89/90 in the 30-year as that area equates to the initial objective
in the 10-year of 3.10. I’ll certainly post more as the wave develops presuming
of course that it does. The impetus for the rally on Friday was the jobs number and the degree to
which it impacted stocks. While the net gain in NFP was impressive by
historical standards, the number still fell short of expectations and the
private sector jobs gained were way less than expected. If you go back and
look, you will see that in the first 5 months of last year, NFP dropped a
whopping 3.3 million jobs while during the first 5 months of this year they’ve
gained 742,000 so from that perspective, things aren’t all bad. Still, the poor
performance of the private sector job growth was enough to send the Dow down
320 points, the SPX down 38, the 10-year up 1 3/8ths of a point and the 30-year
up 2 3/8ths. With all of that came a huge up day in the Dollar Index which
traded to levels not seen since March of 2009 while Gold was gaining $13. Look
at all of those quotes and the phrase ‘flight to quality’ comes to mind. The stock charts don’t look so good after Friday as now, the SPX has
retraced 70% of the rally – the Dow nearly 80% - and that much retracing
typically leads to new lows in the case of a down-trend. Looking at weekly
charts the best objectives now – and by best I mean highest – seem to be near
1006 SPX followed by 943 and near 9429 Dow and then 8864. That’s just from a
cursory look using Fibonacci retracements but I will be putting up better
objectives in the event that we do make new lows. For today, the 10’s would need to break under 120-07 to show any sign of
weakness at all and then 119-25+ should still offer good support. On any new
highs, besides those 2 objectives posted above in the cash 10’s and 30’s, the
10-year futures made a high on the 21st at 121-05 and then the
highest highs came on the 25th at 121-11 and not to be forgotten is
the overnight highs made on the 24th/25th at 121-20+.
Wave analysis, like any other technical analysis, can be adversely impacted by
news and it is always a good idea to let the dust settle after such an event. Last
night the stocks were down hard again and the 10’s were pretty well bid but by
this morning, both had reversed and were moving counter to what they had done
on Friday so for now, those gaps are still intact even if smaller than they had
been. I’d like to get another day of trading under my belt before I go too far
with the projections for this newer wave count but for now, I am expecting
higher highs. <charts> 6/04/10
– 8:15 – With downside gaps through the previous lows
yesterday morning it appeared that the treasuries had begun a second impulsive
decline but by mid-day they had filled those gaps and things were looking up. A downward drift into
the close left things somewhat confusing and this morning, to add to the
confusion, they are back at yesterday’s highs. The lows yesterday cannot be the
end of a 3rd wave off the top since we’ve already traded above what
would have to be called the wave-1 low at 119-09+, and the second decline was
shorter than the first making the likelihood that it was a C-wave seem not very
good. That secondary break could prove to be the early stages of a 3rd
or C-wave, otherwise it was just a B-wave low and we could rally back to as
high as 120-00+ in the 10’s before heading back down once again. Looking at the
10-year charts, it is just difficult to figure that these new lows hold
although we did come within about 2 basis points of the 38% retracement of the
entire move from 4.01 to 3.09. That can be significant but having fallen short
of that potential target in both cash and futures and having failed to achieve
wave equality targets as well, it’s difficult for me to believe that was the
end of a correction. The 30-year charts, however, offer up a different picture,
since while the structure looks about the same as in the 10’s, the levels hit
yesterday are much more intriguing. The low in futures came in at the exact 38%
retracement of the entire rally out of the April low while the cash traded to
4.318 with the 38% target there being 4.317. They didn’t make their wave
equality targets either but those direct hits on what are great targets merits at least some respect and in the case of
the cash 30’s, that high yield was also just 1 bp from a trend-line drawn off
the April yield crest. I am not about to call that the end of the correction
just yet, but I might be in about a half an hour. If we can catch a strong bid
today, I will not fight the notion of still higher highs pending. A trade in
the 10’s above 120-01 suggests to me that they are likely to at least test the
gap above and if that doesn’t stop them, then we could be in for 2 more
impulses to the upside. While that’s not my favored count now, I won’t fight it.
If we are impulsing down from the highs and still in
the wave-2 correction, then the low of this push should not come before Monday
and probably later than that. And once a rally from a sharp new low begins –
preferably one at or below 118-16 - any trade back above 119-09+ would tell me that
new highs should follow and a top is not likely before mid-month. The perfect target for a low if we are ultimately
headed back up is 118-13+ but things rarely work out perfectly and anywhere in
the gap works. Much below 118-00 and the bullish case begins to lose momentum. The stocks had a nice day yesterday and still look to me like they have
further to rally but they are down again this morning, testing the lows from
yesterday and providing the bid to the treasuries. I still really like the area
of 1130/32 as a great target with no assurances that it stops us but like
bonds, stocks need to get past today in good shape. While the consensus for NFP is about 514,000 which would be the best
number seen in more than a decade, I understand that Goldman Sachs raised their
estimate from 500,000 to 600,000 and who are we to doubt what they ‘think/know’.
If they’re correct, then my favored count calling for lower prices seems likely
to be proven correct but you have to wonder about these early trades up in bonds
and down in stocks. I don’t want to waste more of our time so close to a number that can change everything. In the bigger picture, the 10’s are ok down into the mid to lower 117’s but my thought is to be defensive going into to the release and clearing of longs, if possible, just under 118-26 since much below that and we will be dealing with the gap that runs all the way down to 118-00. If we gap down though the 26 area, then any trade below 118-13 is likely to be followed by one at least to the bottom of the gap. As mentioned above, a trade above 120-01 is constructive and could lead to a test of the ‘island reversal’ gap from 120-17+ to 120-27+ and beyond there - it could be up, up and away. I posted charts of the cash 10’s and 30’s last week with some good, general yield based resistance/targets drawn on them using Fibonacci retracements as well as a trend-line. I am re-posting them today with only one change to the graphics, the inclusion of the ‘wave equality’ targets drawn in blue and labeled ‘100%’. The charts have obviously been updated and I would suggest taking a look at the 30’s, paying special attention to yesterday’s high yield in relationship to the Fibonacci target as well as the trend-line. Given that there was no true reversal, I doubt those levels hold but if I were a bull, I’d sure hope that they do. Without too much of a surprise at 8:30, use 120-02 as a ‘trigger’ that we are likely headed higher, and with the stage set for upside gaps this morning, any trade back under 119-05 would be very suspicious. <charts> 6/03/10
– 8:15 – I had suggested earlier this week that the rally into the highs on
Tuesday was likely only an A-wave and that a B-wave should follow that would
carry the treasuries back down to the lows of the move before a C-wave rally would
return them to Tuesday’s highs. If all that were to have happened, the next big
move would still have come on the downside. That prognosis actually looked even
better following yesterday’s action as the 30’s actually matched their low from
last week right on the close with the 10’s not far behind. This morning both
are under pressure, however, and they will both be making new lows of this
pullback on the opening, putting serious doubt into the notion that they have
another rally left in them. One way or the other, a secondary decline should have
materialized but now it appears that waiting for that last bounce may prove to have
been a mistake. Should we get a real surprise tomorrow in either direction, only
the ‘island reversal’ gap above from 120-17+ to 120-27+ as well as the range
below mentioned in yesterday’s update from 118-16+ down to 118-00, really
matter much. A break-out above 120-27+ tells me that the high is not likely to
occur for another several weeks and a good 30 bps from here while a break below
118-00 will put a severe strain on the longer-term health of the market. Two
caveats go along with that previous sentence. On a break through 3.09, while
the wave structure tells me the rally should extend into at least the upper
2.80’s, 3.026 represents a 50% retracement of the entire bear market that began
back in December of 2008 and that makes it a great support level regardless of
wave structure. And should we continue to break to the downside, while I would
expect the break to carry the 10’s down at least a point from where they closed
yesterday, a bullish pattern can still emerge from yields as high as 3.69, so
in no way will the bond world come to an end on Friday. Wave patterns should give
me a heads up on what’s going on long before any objectives are met but for
now, this break to new lows likely places us in the second impulse wave off the
3.09 trade several weeks ago and how the markets correct following this second impulse
will tell me if we are likely in a bigger bear market. As much as I loved the
area that has so far stopped the bigger rally that began back in April, nothing
yet tells me that the yield trough made last week has to hold. For the
short-term my bias is to the downside and even for the longer-term I am leaning
that way but I’ll still leave the door open for a friendly outcome. 6/02/10
– 8:15 – The rally out of the low on Wednesday now looks to be a 3-wave move and
that means lower lows should still follow. Following a strong upside gap in
treasuries concurrent with a very weak stock market early yesterday, the stocks
recovered nicely for the first part of the day and with that, the treasuries
faded and eliminated any suggestion that they might be impulsing up. By the
close, the stocks had given back their entire recovery and the 10’s were once
again on the move up but from the standpoint of wave structure, the damage had
already been done. The 30’s look even more corrective than do the 10’s by
virtue of having rallied less so I see no reason to be anything but defensive
in here. While the apparent 3-wave rally could be read as an ABC that is done, it
is more likely that it just an A-wave and with the jobs report due out on
Friday, that’s probably a pretty good guess. Wave theory supports the
A-wave theory as well since there is no
clear 5-wave move into the highs which is how an ABC should end. The rally high
in the 10’s yesterday came in at 120-15+ while the island gap starts at 17+ and
the 62% retracement target was at 18 so that high was actually at a pretty good
level. The low yield in cash was at 3.226 while the 50% correction was at 3.225
so that was maybe even better. If we have done an A-wave up, then the target
for the B-wave is right back down at the lows which were at 119-09 in futures
and at 3.351 in cash. The 30-year equivalents are much closer at 122-08 and
3.984. And following that B-wave decline, we can expect to see yesterday’s
highs tested once again as the C-wave runs its’ course. Of course with just 2
days left before jobs data is released, that pattern just may not have time to
develop but it is what it is. Should the 10’s break to new lows at any time
without first trading above yesterday’s highs, a wave equality target comes in
at 118-13+, but if we do break down to that area, there is also a gap that runs
from 118-16 down to 118-00 as well as a potentially even more important target
at 118-16+ which represents the 38% retracement of the entire rally from the
April low to the recent highs. The more friendly wave count going forward, the
one depicted in the second chart Friday’s report, allows for a large potential ‘B-wave’
low to be anywhere in the range of Fibonacci retracements of the entire rally
so suffice it to say that should the 10’s make it down to 118-16+, things could
get real interesting. Also worth keeping in mind is that we are working on a
new contract now, one that wasn’t traded much during the entire rally, so
paying attention to those bigger-pattern targets in cash will be a must. I
might suggest that you refer back to the 2 charts posted in the update
yesterday even though they don’t include the wave equality targets, which only developed
following the rally yesterday. To review, the 38% retracement target for the 10’s
is at 3.446 while the wave equality target is at 3.479 and the equivalent gap
runs from 3.509 to 3.524. In the 30-year the 38% number is 4.317, the wave
equality target 4.401 and the gap is from 4.514 to 4.532. We may not need to be
thinking about those levels just yet but by Friday morning it would a good idea
to have them all in front of you when the jobs report is released. 6/01/10
– 8:15 – The 10’s are up half a point this morning as the stocks have once again
come under pressure. Following a long weekend, I had to go back and look at the
charts to remember what exactly happened last week. Starting with the
long-term, the weekly chart of the 10-year shows a key reversal towards higher
yields so that right there suggests a negative bias, at least until I find some
mitigating evidence. The 30’s don’t show the same pattern since they didn’t
make a new high last week but that’s not much to hang your hat on if you are a
bull. And lest we forget, there is that 1-day island reversal at the top. Add
some bearish divergence on daily oscillators and then there’s that potentially very
bearish wave count that targeted exactly the area that stopped the rally. So
the fact is that we’ve got a pretty negative backdrop. The fact is that there just
were not a lot of positives as we headed into the holiday weekend. When I look
at the intra-day charts for wave patterns from the highs, I honestly don’t see
a clear count as far as impulse vs. corrective goes. It can still go either
way. The pattern from the low on the 13th, however, is a different
matter as it seems clear that the impulse that began on the 13th is
over. That doesn’t mean we can’t still see a rally but if the 10’s cannot hold
3.413, the 62% retracement of that rally, then they are likely headed back to
the yield crest from the 13th at 3.607. So far, the high yield since
last Monday’s 3.098, was at 3.351 while the 50% correction is at 3.353 so they
could recover from there but if they do make a turnaround and take out last
week’s yield trough, then wave theory would suggest not just one more new high
is coming but several, likely extending the rally for weeks and at least into
the 2.70’s. I can’t yet rule out that scenario but I do think the burden is on
the bulls to make it happen. At least today they’ve made a start. Below are 2 charts, the first is the cash 10-year and the second is the 30-year. Both are yield charts and once again I must remind you that the decimal point is misplaced (33.00 means 3.30%). These charts show what should be good support and objectives going forward in all but the most bullish of scenarios – the one scenario that could be playing out as this report is being published. If this rally extends, I’ll deal with the upside potential tomorrow but if it fails, I’m not so sure that the word ‘objectives’ is appropriate for the levels shown on these charts since my concern is that the high we just made could lead to a complete retracement of the move that began in early April – and then some. The red horizontal lines are the Fibonacci retracements while the blue line is obviously a trend-line and 3 important gaps are shown as well. At least some of those areas will produce strong support even if they don’t produce a trend-change. If this early burst can hold and the 10’s can manage to trade through that 3.09 print, then I doubt these charts will be of much use since I feel like just a little higher will translate into a whole lot higher. <charts> |